Skip to content
takeaway
genius
Meal

Domino's

4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce

Per serve (171 g), chicken

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce has 424 Cal (1,780 kJ), 23 g protein, 48 g carbohydrate (48 g sugars), 15 g fat (1.7 g saturated) and 1,180 mg sodium per serve (171 g), according to Domino's's published Australian nutrition information.

424 Cal1,780 kJ

20% of an average adult’s daily energy (8,700 kJ)

Protein

23 g

22% of energy

Carbs

48 g

46% of energy

Fat

15 g

32% of energy

Saturated fat
1.7 g
Sugars
48 g
Sodium
1,180 mg
Fibre
Not available
Customise and addCompare with another item

Lighter chicken

4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce vs similar items

4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce nutrition questions

How many calories are in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce has 424 Cal (1,780 kJ) per serve, which is 20% of the 8,700 kJ average adult daily energy intake.

How much protein is in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce has 23 g of protein per serve.

How many carbs are in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce has 48 g of carbohydrate per serve, including 48 g of sugars.

How much fat is in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce has 15 g of fat per serve, of which 1.7 g is saturated.

How much sodium (salt) is in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce has 1,180 mg of sodium per serve.

Is the Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Hot Honey Sauce high in protein?

It has 5.5 g of protein per 100 Cal, compared with an average of 7 g per 100 Cal across Domino's's chicken.

Source: Domino's nutrition information as at 15 October 2026. Spot something wrong? Suggest an edit