Skip to content
takeaway
genius
Meal

Domino's

4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce

Per serve (181 g), chicken

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce has 479 Cal (2,010 kJ), 24 g protein, 30 g carbohydrate (28 g sugars), 29 g fat (2.7 g saturated) and 1,410 mg sodium per serve (181 g), according to Domino's's published Australian nutrition information.

479 Cal2,010 kJ

23% of an average adult’s daily energy (8,700 kJ)

Protein

24 g

20% of energy

Carbs

30 g

25% of energy

Fat

29 g

55% of energy

Saturated fat
2.7 g
Sugars
28 g
Sodium
1,410 mg
Fibre
Not available
Customise and addCompare with another item

Lighter chicken

4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce vs similar items

4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce nutrition questions

How many calories are in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce has 479 Cal (2,010 kJ) per serve, which is 23% of the 8,700 kJ average adult daily energy intake.

How much protein is in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce has 24 g of protein per serve.

How many carbs are in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce has 30 g of carbohydrate per serve, including 28 g of sugars.

How much fat is in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce has 29 g of fat per serve, of which 2.7 g is saturated.

How much sodium (salt) is in a Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce?

A Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce has 1,410 mg of sodium per serve.

Is the Domino's 4 Pack Saucy Chicken Tenders – Peri Peri Sauce high in protein?

It has 4.9 g of protein per 100 Cal, compared with an average of 7 g per 100 Cal across Domino's's chicken.

Source: Domino's nutrition information as at 15 October 2026. Spot something wrong? Suggest an edit