New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun vs Double Filet-O-Fish®
Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun compared with McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
Grill'dNew Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun490 Cal2,050 kJMcDonald'sDouble Filet-O-Fish®486 Cal2,030 kJ
- Protein
- 43 g
- 25 g
- Carbs
- 30 g
- 43 g
- Sugars
- 2.9 g
- 5.8 g
- Fat
- 22 g
- 22 g
- Saturated fat
- 5.1 g
- 4.2 g
- Fibre
- 5.7 g
- Not available
- Sodium
- 640 mg
- 876 mg
New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun or Double Filet-O-Fish®?
Which has fewer calories, the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun or the McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®?
The McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish® has fewer: 486 Cal (2,030 kJ), compared with 490 Cal (2,050 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun or the McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®?
The Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun has more protein: 43 g, compared with 25 g in the McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®.
Which has more carbs, the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun or the McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®?
The McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish® has more carbs: 43 g, compared with 30 g in the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun.
Which has more fat, the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun or the McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®?
They have the same: 22 g each.
Which has more sodium, the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun or the McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish®?
The McDonald's Double Filet-O-Fish® has more sodium: 876 mg, compared with 640 mg in the Grill'd New Oscar Piastri Chicken Burger – Charcoal Bun.