JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ vs Chicken RappSnacker
Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ compared with Oporto Chicken RappSnacker, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 9.8 g
- 17 g
- Carbs
- 25 g
- 44 g
- Sugars
- 4.3 g
- 6.3 g
- Fat
- 11 g
- 10 g
- Saturated fat
- 1.9 g
- 1.1 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 721 mg
- 810 mg
JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ or Chicken RappSnacker?
Which has fewer calories, the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ has fewer: 237 Cal (993 kJ), compared with 340 Cal (1,440 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more protein: 17 g, compared with 9.8 g in the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ.
Which has more carbs, the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more carbs: 44 g, compared with 25 g in the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ.
Which has more fat, the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ has more fat: 11 g, compared with 10 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more sodium, the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more sodium: 810 mg, compared with 721 mg in the Hungry Jack's JFC Tender Snack Wrap – Smoky BBQ.