Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap vs Chicken RappSnacker
Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap compared with Oporto Chicken RappSnacker, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 23 g
- 17 g
- Carbs
- 28 g
- 44 g
- Sugars
- 2.5 g
- 6.3 g
- Fat
- 23 g
- 10 g
- Saturated fat
- 5.4 g
- 1.1 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 644 mg
- 810 mg
Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap or Chicken RappSnacker?
Which has fewer calories, the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap has fewer: 295 Cal (1,236 kJ), compared with 340 Cal (1,440 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap has more protein: 23 g, compared with 17 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more carbs, the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more carbs: 44 g, compared with 28 g in the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap.
Which has more fat, the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap has more fat: 23 g, compared with 10 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more sodium, the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more sodium: 810 mg, compared with 644 mg in the Hungry Jack's Kids Grilled Chicken Wrap.