Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets vs Flayva Wrap
Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets compared with Red Rooster Flayva Wrap, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 39 g
- 29 g
- Carbs
- 50 g
- 37 g
- Sugars
- 8.5 g
- 3.5 g
- Fat
- 26 g
- 47 g
- Saturated fat
- 7.4 g
- 12 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 4,020 mg
- 1,275 mg
Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets or Flayva Wrap?
Which has fewer calories, the Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets has fewer: 636 Cal (2,660 kJ), compared with 680 Cal (2,870 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets has more protein: 39 g, compared with 29 g in the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap.
Which has more carbs, the Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets has more carbs: 50 g, compared with 37 g in the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap.
Which has more fat, the Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Red Rooster Flayva Wrap has more fat: 47 g, compared with 26 g in the Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets.
Which has more sodium, the Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Nando's Smoky Churrasco Wrap – Chicken Leg Fillets has more sodium: 4,020 mg, compared with 1,275 mg in the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap.