Chicken RappSnacker vs Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap
Oporto Chicken RappSnacker compared with McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 17 g
- 12 g
- Carbs
- 44 g
- 32 g
- Sugars
- 6.3 g
- 1.7 g
- Fat
- 10 g
- 14 g
- Saturated fat
- 1.1 g
- 2.9 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 810 mg
- 491 mg
Chicken RappSnacker or Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap?
Which has fewer calories, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap?
The McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap has fewer: 316 Cal (1,310 kJ), compared with 340 Cal (1,440 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more protein: 17 g, compared with 12 g in the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap.
Which has more carbs, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more carbs: 44 g, compared with 32 g in the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap.
Which has more fat, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap?
The McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap has more fat: 14 g, compared with 10 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more sodium, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more sodium: 810 mg, compared with 491 mg in the McDonald's Crispy Chicken Snack Wrap.