Chicken RappSnacker vs Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap
Oporto Chicken RappSnacker compared with Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 17 g
- 17 g
- Carbs
- 44 g
- 47 g
- Sugars
- 6.3 g
- 8.4 g
- Fat
- 10 g
- 13 g
- Saturated fat
- 1.1 g
- 6.5 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- 2.5 g
- Sodium
- 810 mg
- 1,130 mg
Chicken RappSnacker or Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap?
Which has fewer calories, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has fewer: 340 Cal (1,440 kJ), compared with 375 Cal (1,570 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more protein: 17 g, compared with 17 g in the Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap.
Which has more carbs, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap?
The Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap has more carbs: 47 g, compared with 44 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more fat, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap?
The Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap has more fat: 13 g, compared with 10 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more sodium, the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker or the Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap?
The Subway Honey Mustard Leg Ham Wrap has more sodium: 1,130 mg, compared with 810 mg in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.