Halloumi & Chicken Burger vs Double Big Mac®
Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger compared with McDonald's Double Big Mac®, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 40 g
- 42 g
- Carbs
- 64 g
- 52 g
- Sugars
- 15 g
- 8.4 g
- Fat
- 47 g
- 48 g
- Saturated fat
- 11 g
- 20 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 1,485 mg
- 1,692 mg
Halloumi & Chicken Burger or Double Big Mac®?
Which has fewer calories, the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger or the McDonald's Double Big Mac®?
The McDonald's Double Big Mac® has fewer: 813 Cal (3,400 kJ), compared with 820 Cal (3,450 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger or the McDonald's Double Big Mac®?
The McDonald's Double Big Mac® has more protein: 42 g, compared with 40 g in the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger.
Which has more carbs, the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger or the McDonald's Double Big Mac®?
The Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger has more carbs: 64 g, compared with 52 g in the McDonald's Double Big Mac®.
Which has more fat, the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger or the McDonald's Double Big Mac®?
The McDonald's Double Big Mac® has more fat: 48 g, compared with 47 g in the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger.
Which has more sodium, the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger or the McDonald's Double Big Mac®?
The McDonald's Double Big Mac® has more sodium: 1,692 mg, compared with 1,485 mg in the Oporto Halloumi & Chicken Burger.