Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal vs Flayva Wrap
Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal compared with Red Rooster Flayva Wrap, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 23 g
- 29 g
- Carbs
- 88 g
- 37 g
- Sugars
- 12 g
- 3.5 g
- Fat
- 29 g
- 47 g
- Saturated fat
- 3.7 g
- 12 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 1,030 mg
- 1,275 mg
Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal or Flayva Wrap?
Which has fewer calories, the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Red Rooster Flayva Wrap has fewer: 680 Cal (2,870 kJ), compared with 670 Cal (3,000 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Red Rooster Flayva Wrap has more protein: 29 g, compared with 23 g in the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal.
Which has more carbs, the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal has more carbs: 88 g, compared with 37 g in the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap.
Which has more fat, the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Red Rooster Flayva Wrap has more fat: 47 g, compared with 29 g in the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal.
Which has more sodium, the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal or the Red Rooster Flayva Wrap?
The Red Rooster Flayva Wrap has more sodium: 1,275 mg, compared with 1,030 mg in the Oporto Kid-O's Grilled Chicken RappSnacker Meal.