Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha vs Small Biscoff Latte
Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha compared with Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 11 g
- 8 g
- Carbs
- 45 g
- 27 g
- Sugars
- 38 g
- 14 g
- Fat
- 14 g
- 23 g
- Saturated fat
- 10 g
- 6.3 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 218 mg
- 129 mg
Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha or Small Biscoff Latte?
Which has fewer calories, the Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha or the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte?
The Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte has fewer: 342 Cal (1,432 kJ), compared with 351 Cal (1,470 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha or the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte?
The Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha has more protein: 11 g, compared with 8 g in the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte.
Which has more carbs, the Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha or the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte?
The Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha has more carbs: 45 g, compared with 27 g in the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte.
Which has more fat, the Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha or the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte?
The Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte has more fat: 23 g, compared with 14 g in the Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha.
Which has more sodium, the Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha or the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte?
The Soul Origin Large White Hot Chocolate Mocha has more sodium: 218 mg, compared with 129 mg in the Hungry Jack's Small Biscoff Latte.