Chicken Schnitzel Wrap vs Chicken Rappa
Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap compared with Oporto Chicken Rappa, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 24 g
- 27 g
- Carbs
- 49 g
- 34 g
- Sugars
- 5.4 g
- 6.4 g
- Fat
- 24 g
- 19 g
- Saturated fat
- 7.3 g
- 4 g
- Fibre
- 3.3 g
- Not available
- Sodium
- 1,230 mg
- 675 mg
Chicken Schnitzel Wrap or Chicken Rappa?
Which has fewer calories, the Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap or the Oporto Chicken Rappa?
The Oporto Chicken Rappa has fewer: 420 Cal (1,760 kJ), compared with 513 Cal (2,150 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap or the Oporto Chicken Rappa?
The Oporto Chicken Rappa has more protein: 27 g, compared with 24 g in the Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap.
Which has more carbs, the Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap or the Oporto Chicken Rappa?
The Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap has more carbs: 49 g, compared with 34 g in the Oporto Chicken Rappa.
Which has more fat, the Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap or the Oporto Chicken Rappa?
The Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap has more fat: 24 g, compared with 19 g in the Oporto Chicken Rappa.
Which has more sodium, the Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap or the Oporto Chicken Rappa?
The Subway Chicken Schnitzel Wrap has more sodium: 1,230 mg, compared with 675 mg in the Oporto Chicken Rappa.