Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap vs HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket
Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap compared with Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 24 g
- 17 g
- Carbs
- 56 g
- 32 g
- Sugars
- 16 g
- 4.3 g
- Fat
- 12 g
- 25 g
- Saturated fat
- 6.2 g
- 3.3 g
- Fibre
- 3 g
- 1.5 g
- Sodium
- 963 mg
- 560 mg
Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap or HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket?
Which has fewer calories, the Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap or the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket?
The Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket has fewer: 416 Cal (1,740 kJ), compared with 429 Cal (1,790 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap or the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket?
The Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap has more protein: 24 g, compared with 17 g in the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket.
Which has more carbs, the Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap or the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket?
The Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap has more carbs: 56 g, compared with 32 g in the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket.
Which has more fat, the Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap or the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket?
The Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket has more fat: 25 g, compared with 12 g in the Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap.
Which has more sodium, the Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap or the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket?
The Subway Sweet Onion Chicken Teriyaki Wrap has more sodium: 963 mg, compared with 560 mg in the Grill'd HFC Julius Caesar Pocket Rocket.