HFC Original Pocket Rocket vs Chicken RappSnacker
Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket compared with Oporto Chicken RappSnacker, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 16 g
- 17 g
- Carbs
- 33 g
- 44 g
- Sugars
- 4.2 g
- 6.3 g
- Fat
- 17 g
- 10 g
- Saturated fat
- 2.3 g
- 1.1 g
- Fibre
- 1.5 g
- Not available
- Sodium
- 904 mg
- 810 mg
HFC Original Pocket Rocket or Chicken RappSnacker?
Which has fewer calories, the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has fewer: 340 Cal (1,440 kJ), compared with 366 Cal (1,530 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more protein: 17 g, compared with 16 g in the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket.
Which has more carbs, the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Oporto Chicken RappSnacker has more carbs: 44 g, compared with 33 g in the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket.
Which has more fat, the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket has more fat: 17 g, compared with 10 g in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.
Which has more sodium, the Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket or the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker?
The Grill'd HFC Original Pocket Rocket has more sodium: 904 mg, compared with 810 mg in the Oporto Chicken RappSnacker.