Grilled Chicken Classic vs Filet-O-Fish®
Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic compared with McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 22 g
- 15 g
- Carbs
- 27 g
- 35 g
- Sugars
- 4.6 g
- 5.2 g
- Fat
- 17 g
- 15 g
- Saturated fat
- 1.9 g
- 2.5 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- Not available
- Sodium
- 661 mg
- 618 mg
Grilled Chicken Classic or Filet-O-Fish®?
Which has fewer calories, the Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic or the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®?
The McDonald's Filet-O-Fish® has fewer: 337 Cal (1,410 kJ), compared with 350 Cal (1,465 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic or the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®?
The Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic has more protein: 22 g, compared with 15 g in the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®.
Which has more carbs, the Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic or the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®?
The McDonald's Filet-O-Fish® has more carbs: 35 g, compared with 27 g in the Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic.
Which has more fat, the Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic or the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®?
The Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic has more fat: 17 g, compared with 15 g in the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®.
Which has more sodium, the Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic or the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®?
The Hungry Jack's Grilled Chicken Classic has more sodium: 661 mg, compared with 618 mg in the McDonald's Filet-O-Fish®.