Mango Soft Serve vs Soft Serve Cone
Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve compared with Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 1.4 g
- 3.8 g
- Carbs
- 12 g
- 31 g
- Sugars
- 12 g
- 21 g
- Fat
- 0.9 g
- 4.5 g
- Saturated fat
- 0.7 g
- 3 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- 0.6 g
- Sodium
- 22 mg
- 93 mg
Mango Soft Serve or Soft Serve Cone?
Which has fewer calories, the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve or the Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone?
The Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve has fewer: 64 Cal (268 kJ), compared with 181 Cal (759 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve or the Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone?
The Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone has more protein: 3.8 g, compared with 1.4 g in the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve.
Which has more carbs, the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve or the Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone?
The Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone has more carbs: 31 g, compared with 12 g in the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve.
Which has more fat, the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve or the Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone?
The Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone has more fat: 4.5 g, compared with 0.9 g in the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve.
Which has more sodium, the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve or the Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone?
The Guzman y Gomez Soft Serve Cone has more sodium: 93 mg, compared with 22 mg in the Yo-Chi Mango Soft Serve.