Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef vs Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell
Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef compared with Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell, per serve, from each brand’s published Australian nutrition information.
- Protein
- 15 g
- 13 g
- Carbs
- 25 g
- 21 g
- Sugars
- 4.5 g
- 1.4 g
- Fat
- 16 g
- 17 g
- Saturated fat
- 8.3 g
- 4.3 g
- Fibre
- Not available
- 1.3 g
- Sodium
- 507 mg
- 648 mg
Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef or Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?
Which has fewer calories, the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef or the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?
The Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has fewer: 294 Cal (1,230 kJ), compared with 304 Cal (1,270 kJ).
Which has more protein, the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef or the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?
The Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef has more protein: 15 g, compared with 13 g in the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell.
Which has more carbs, the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef or the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?
The Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef has more carbs: 25 g, compared with 21 g in the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell.
Which has more fat, the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef or the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?
The Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has more fat: 17 g, compared with 16 g in the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef.
Which has more sodium, the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef or the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?
The Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has more sodium: 648 mg, compared with 507 mg in the Zambrero Dos Capas Taco – Barbacoa Beef.