Skip to content
takeaway
genius
Meal

Guzman y Gomez

Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell

Per serve (108 g), mains

A Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has 294 Cal (1,230 kJ), 13 g protein, 21 g carbohydrate (1.4 g sugars), 17 g fat (4.3 g saturated), 648 mg sodium and 1.3 g fibre per serve (108 g), according to Guzman y Gomez's published Australian nutrition information.

294 Cal1,230 kJ

14% of an average adult’s daily energy (8,700 kJ)

Protein

13 g

18% of energy

Carbs

21 g

30% of energy

Fat

17 g

52% of energy

Saturated fat
4.3 g
Sugars
1.4 g
Sodium
648 mg
Fibre
1.3 g
Customise and addCompare with another item

Lighter mains

Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell vs similar items

Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell nutrition questions

How many calories are in a Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?

A Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has 294 Cal (1,230 kJ) per serve, which is 14% of the 8,700 kJ average adult daily energy intake.

How much protein is in a Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?

A Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has 13 g of protein per serve.

How many carbs are in a Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?

A Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has 21 g of carbohydrate per serve, including 1.4 g of sugars.

How much fat is in a Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?

A Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has 17 g of fat per serve, of which 4.3 g is saturated.

How much sodium (salt) is in a Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell?

A Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell has 648 mg of sodium per serve.

Is the Guzman y Gomez Crispy Chicken Tender Taco – Soft Shell high in protein?

It has 4.4 g of protein per 100 Cal, compared with an average of 4.6 g per 100 Cal across Guzman y Gomez's mains.

Source: Guzman y Gomez nutrition information as at 8 October 2026. Spot something wrong? Suggest an edit